THE MAGICAL 72 HOURS – DOES IT EXIST IN PRACTICE?

THE MAGICAL 72 HOURS – DOES IT EXIST IN PRACTICE?

This paper is being presented at the WSUD 2013 Conference

The Magical 72 Hours – Does it Exist in Practice?

AUTHORS

Thomas Cousland, Water Technology, Melbourne, Australia
David Reginato, Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Australia
Sarah Law, Water Technology, Melbourne, Australia
David Carew, Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Australia
Chris Beardshaw, Water Technology, Melbourne, Australia

ABSTRACT

Wetlands across Melbourne and Australia have generally been designed with a notional 72 hour detention time in line with the practice notes presented in the WSUD Engineering Procedures (CSIRO, 2005). Melbourne Water operates over 160 urban wetland systems as part of its role as drainage and stormwater manager within the greater Melbourne metropolitan area. Whilst many of these systems are preferentially offline systems a variety of catchment setup and flow regimes can be seen. Whilst all are notionally designed for a 72 hour detention time, this paper explores whether this occurs in practice across a monitored wetland.
Continuous simulation of a recently constructed wetland has been undertaken to assess the flow characteristics of the constructed outlet structures. This has been undertaken using long term flow simulations in a 1D hydraulic model. Bathymetric survey of Melbourne Water’s Brushy Creek wetland in Croydon was utilized, and the system was monitored over a number of events to determine water levels and hydraulic influences. This calibrated data set allows comparison to the results determined through the best practice design standards. Final recommendations for the practicality of outlet structures and the 72 hour notional detention time are then drawn.

You can download the full paper here

Back

At work across Australia

With offices throughout the country, our team brings a
national perspective to local challenges.

Talk to an expert